- Home
- About
- Invest
Local Portfolios
Global Portfolios
- Wealth
- Media Centre
- Contact
Global Report
Global Market Prospects.
Learn more
Local Report
Local Market Prospects.
Learn more
Market Indicators
Global and Local Indicators.
Learn more
Global Report: IMF World Economic Outlook April 2024
By Carel la Cock
The global economy exhibited surprising resilience amidst the disinflationary phase from 2022 to 2023, with economic activity holding steady despite rising central bank interest rates. This resilience was supported by favourable demand and supply dynamics in major economies, although challenges such as high government debt levels and geopolitical tensions persisted.
As inflation approached pre-pandemic levels by late 2023, some developed and emerging market economies still struggled to reach target levels. Despite these inflationary challenges, global economic growth remained robust, surpassing earlier forecasts. The United States and several emerging market economies notably outperformed expectations, driven by strong private consumption and government spending.
However, disparities existed among regions, with the euro area displaying weaker growth due to subdued consumer sentiment and high energy prices. Additionally, lower-income countries faced higher-than-expected inflation and slower growth, attributed to factors like currency depreciation which filtered into the real economy via higher costs for imported goods such as fuel, food and fertilizers.
The global economy’s resilience was supported by post-pandemic supply-side expansions, including a rise in the labour force and increased business investment in response to growing demand. Notably, some economies saw a surge in migrant labour force participation, while others, like China, faced broader labour market weakness.
Furthermore, improvements in supply chain logistics and a decline in transportation costs contributed to economic stability, despite disruptions from events like attacks on commercial shipping and climate-related challenges in key trade routes. Energy prices also fell faster than anticipated, driven by increased oil and natural gas production, particularly in non-OPEC countries like the United States, as well as expanded Russian oil exports.
Since 2022, the decrease in headline inflation primarily stems from diminishing relative price shocks, notably in energy, and reduced core inflation. This decline in energy prices is attributed to increased global supply and tight monetary policies, synchronously implemented by major central banks. Core inflation has decreased due to the waning effects of past headline inflation shocks and easing labour market pressures. Near-term inflation expectations have approached target levels globally, yet financial-market-based measures in the US show a slight increase.
Despite tight labour markets, nominal wage growth has been contained, particularly in the euro area, leading to stagnant or slightly decreased real wages. Wage-price spirals have not materialized, though wages at the lower end of the distribution have risen faster, compressing wage differentials. Factors reducing core inflation differ across major economies, with the US experiencing upward pressure due to labour market tightness and strong macroeconomic conditions. Conversely, the euro area and UK have seen larger roles played by the rapid fading of past relative price movements and pre-pandemic labour market tightness, respectively. IMF estimates reveal positive output gaps in the US and negative gaps in the euro area and UK for 2023.
To combat rising inflation, major central banks have raised policy interest rates to restrictive levels. This has led to increased mortgage costs and tighter credit availability, impacting firms’ ability to refinance debt, causing corporate bankruptcies, and dampening business and residential investment. The commercial real estate sector, particularly office markets, is facing significant pressure due to higher borrowing costs and the shift to remote work. Despite these challenges, a global economic downturn resulting from the rate hikes has not materialized for several reasons. Some central banks adjusted nominal interest rates after inflation expectations rose, resulting in lower real rates initially supporting economic activity. Additionally, households in major advanced economies could rely on pandemic savings to mitigate the impact of higher borrowing costs. Changes in mortgage and housing markets over the pre-pandemic decade, such as increased fixed-rate mortgages, have also moderated the immediate impact of rate hikes on household consumption. However, the cooling effects of high policy rates are becoming more pronounced, leading to mortgage resets and declining pandemic savings availability. Nonetheless, with inflation nearing targets, expectations of lower interest rates in advanced economies have eased financial conditions globally, prompting increased asset appetite in emerging markets and reduced sovereign spreads on government debt. As a result, more governments are accessing international debt markets to alleviate funding shortages.
Looking ahead, the pace of economic expansion is expected to remain modest by historical standards, influenced by several factors such as the long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, weak productivity growth, and increasing geoeconomic fragmentation. Additionally, the tightening of fiscal policies to address high government debt levels, including higher taxes and reduced government spending, is anticipated to dampen growth prospects.
The latest projections indicate continued global economic growth at a pace similar to that of 2023, expected to persist throughout 2024–25. Although the global growth forecast remains largely unchanged since the January 2024 World Economic Outlook (WEO) Update, there have been some adjustments for major economies.
The United States is projected to experience a further strengthening, with growth expected to increase to 2.7% in 2024 before slowing to 1.9% in 2025 due to gradual fiscal tightening and labour market softening. This represents an upward revision of 0.6 percentage points from the January 2024 WEO Update.
Conversely, the euro area is forecasted to recover from a low growth rate of 0.4% in 2023 to 0.8% in 2024 and 1.5% in 2025, driven by stronger household consumption as energy price shocks subside. However, Germany’s growth outlook has been revised downward by 0.3 percentage points for both 2024 and 2025 due to persistently weak consumer sentiment.
In the United Kingdom, growth is projected to rise from 0.1% in 2023 to 0.5% in 2024 and 1.5% in 2025, supported by easing financial conditions and recovering real incomes as disinflation occurs. Japan’s output is expected to slow from 1.9% in 2023 to 0.9% in 2024 and 1% in 2025 due to the fading of one-off factors that supported growth in 2023.
These projections reflect a global economic landscape characterized by restrictive monetary policies, withdrawal of fiscal support, and low underlying productivity growth, contributing to growth rates below historical averages. Despite these challenges, the forecast for global growth in 2024 and 2025 remains higher than that of the October 2023 WEO, with emerging market and developing economies expected to experience stable growth, albeit with regional differences.
Local Report: Navigating uncertainty: South African election through an investor’s lens
By Francios Louw and Sean Fitzpatrick
In the ever-changing environment of South Africa’s political landscape, one thing is certain: uncertainty. As the nation gears up for its upcoming election, the air is thick with anticipation and speculation. Amidst the buzz of campaign promises and political manoeuvres, a feeling of unease looms over the market. Investors, typically skilled at navigating fluctuating landscapes, find themselves treading cautiously and asking the question: Where do I allocate my funds?
Overview of election outcomes
From an investor’s perspective, the least desirable scenario would be an ANC coalition with either the EFF or the newly established Umkhonto we Sizwe Party (MKP). These coalition governments would bring about substantial volatility given their divergent stances on key issues like land expropriation, the nationalisation of mines, and their positions on institutions like the SARB, NPA and SARS. While some media polls suggest these two outcomes are likely to materialise, a recent report by Simon Freemantle from SBG indicates it is less probable.
In Freemantle’s election report, he discusses the following three outcomes to this year’s national election:
Outcome 1 (Probability: 20%) – Should the ANC secure 48% or more of the votes, they might partner with smaller parties like GOOD, Al Jamah-ah, or the AIC. In this scenario, President Ramaphosa’s authority is anticipated to strengthen, providing a semblance of stability amidst potential coalition negotiations.
Outcome 2 (Probability: 60%) – In this base-case scenario, the ANC receives between 43% and 47% of the votes, likely necessitating a coalition partnership with at least one mid-sized party. The most probable coalition partner here would be the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), potentially altering the political landscape. Despite the uncertainty, President Ramaphosa is expected to retain power.
Outcome 3 (Probability: 20%) – The ANC’s vote share dips to 42% or less, forcing them into coalition talks with a larger rival party such as the DA or EFF. This would be unchartered waters for South Africa as these scenarios could result in significant political upheaval, jeopardizing President Ramaphosa’s position and introducing considerable market volatility.
Based on the above outcomes, there is only a 20% likelihood of the ANC receiving less than 42% of the national vote. Even if this occurs, there is no guarantee that the ANC would choose to form a coalition with the EFF or the MKP, given their conflicting viewpoints mentioned earlier. This implies a very high probability that the ANC will retain power by forming a coalition with a smaller or medium-sized party, with Mr Ramaphosa remaining president of South Africa.
Voter Turnout
Voter turnout is defined as the percentage of registered voters who show up on the day and vote, and it is an influential factor in terms of election results. Turnout is predicted to be around 62% for this year’s election, down from 66% in 2019. A lower turnout may favour the ANC, assuming less-engaged voters abstain. A recent Ipsos study (Chart 1) supports this point. In this model, high voter turnout refers to 74-76%, medium to 57%-59%, and low turnout to 41-43% turnout. There also lies potential for an unexpected increase in voter turnout from 2019, due to the unique opportunities and threats that this election presents.
Source: Ipsos, 2024
Provincial Coalitions
With coalitions at the national level appearing increasingly inevitable, attention must also be directed towards the potential configurations of provincial coalition governments. Each province presents a unique political landscape, where parties may need to collaborate to secure governance.
According to the report, coalition governments are anticipated to govern five out of the nine provinces in South Africa. These provinces include Gauteng, KZN, the Western Cape, the Northern Cape, and the Free State. In the Western Cape, there’s a possibility that the DA could lose its majority vote, with both the ANC and the Patriotic Alliance (PA) emerging as contenders in the region. Should this scenario unfold, the margin is projected to be narrow, potentially leading the DA to form a coalition with a smaller party in the area.
Recent polls also indicate a decline in support for the ANC in KZN and Gauteng, with figures expected to dip below 40%. In Gauteng, the ANC may find itself deliberating between coalition partnerships with either the DA or EFF. Similarly, in KZN, the ANC’s options may include forming a coalition with either the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) or the newly established Umkhonto we Sizwe Party (MKP), though the latter scenario is deemed highly unlikely.
Navigating Market Volatility
The election results’ impact on investments hinges on the stability and policy direction of the incoming government. A clear, investor-friendly outcome could bolster market confidence, driving increased investment and potentially higher stock prices for JSE listings. Conversely, uncertainty may lead to investor caution, precipitating market volatility and fluctuations.
Amidst anticipated market volatility, it’s prudent to maintain a long-term strategy emphasizing diversification. Should the election yield a favourable outcome, positioning oneself to capitalize on potential gains in the JSE Top 40 holdings through exposure to local equities is essential. Currently, local stocks are trading at significant discounts due to recent selloffs, presenting substantial upside potential. A favourable scenario could trigger a JSE Top 40 rally of 10-15%, accompanied by the Rand appreciating to approximately R17 against the USD.
In the event of an unfavourable outcome, like our least desirable outcome mentioned above, safeguarding against downside volatility becomes paramount. Diversification across geographical regions and asset classes offers protection. Holding assets with exposure to offshore markets acts as a hedge against the Rand, while reducing exposure to local equities (whose earnings are predominantly linked to the South African economy) helps mitigate potential further declines in local stock prices.
Conclusion
As South Africa stands at the forefront of a new chapter, the stakes have never been higher, and the choices never more consequential. There exists no silver bullet in this complex investment landscape, but a diversified and strategic asset allocation is the sustainable solution. Overberg Asset Management strives to provide exactly that for all clients on a consistent basis. We have been making strategic changes to our local portfolios since the end of 2023 with this year’s elections in mind. By combining exposure to both offshore markets (through ETFs) and local companies, clients can partake in potential rallies of the JSE, while simultaneously hedging against adverse outcomes on the local front.
Market Indicators
Make use of the many indicators below simply by clicking on each of the dropdown menus provided
Edit Content
Edit Content
Reference: Capital Economics – Historical bond and equity return data.
The Bottom Line: Innovation and the Magic of Compounding
By Carel La Cock
The oldest investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange can trace its beginnings back to the surging demand for rubber at the advent of the car industry. Following the Panic of 1907 when the New York Stock Exchange fell nearly 50% from its peak, credit markets dried up and realising the opportunity to lend to rubber plantations in Asia, Colonel Augustus Baillie and Carlyle Gifford established The Straits Mortgage and Trust Company Limited that would ultimately become the behemoth: Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust (SMT), a constituent of the FTSE100.
Baillie Gifford & Co, the investment management company that stewards SMT, oversee total assets in the fund of £16.67bn as at the end of February 2022. Outgoing manager, James Anderson, defined his career with early investments in Amazon and Tesla, which propelled the fund to cumulative growth of 696.8% in the last 10-years, compared to 220.4% for its benchmark, the FTSE All-World Index. Anderson’s investment philosophy has always been based on the belief that technological improvements will drive innovation and that even picking a small number of these successful future companies and holding on to them long enough to let the magic of compounding work, will lead to exceptional returns for clients. Tom Slater, co-manager since 2015, will take over the reins at the end of April and believes that it matters less failing to sell the holdings you should sell, than selling the holdings you should not sell. When they go long on investments, they remain long offering support as patient investors often nurturing private holdings until they go public.
After a stellar performance in 2020 which saw net asset value (NAV) grow by 106.5%, 2021 was more subdued by its own standards, up only 13.2%. This year the share price has come under severe pressure from rising inflation and the rising interest rate used in discounting long duration income flows on many of the growth stocks in its portfolio. Moderna, the manufacturer of Covid-19 vaccines and the largest holding in the portfolio at 8% is down nearly a third year to date, while Tencent, the Chinese e-commerce giant, at 4% of the portfolio is down nearly a fifth this year. Others in the top five holdings: ASML (-13%), Illumina (-9.6%), Tesla (-13%) and NVIDIA (-10.4%) have all been downgraded due to expectations of a steepening yield curve.
Is now the time to panic and if not now, then when? Geopolitical risk is at an all-time high, the US federal reserve has just hiked interest rates for the first time since 2018 and global inflation is running rampant while oil and gas prices have spike on supply fears. However, listening to manager, Tom Slater and deputy manager, Lawrence Burns discuss the current environment and the outlook for the portfolio in a recent investor presentation, you don’t get the sense that now is the time to panic, or indeed ever. Their strategy is long-term, and they have positioned the fund to participate in structural changes and technological advances in society. They have incredible deal flow built on decades of strong relationships and a reputation for stability and patience. Entrepreneurs are keeping companies private for longer and having early access to investment in these opportunities often leads to extraordinary returns.
As for its current top holding, asked if Moderna is a “one-trick-pony” with reference to the major windfall from the Covid19 vaccine, but recently downgraded as investors see the end of the pandemic and the Covid-19 vaccine franchise, Lawrence answered “Moderna is a one trick pony, but that one trick is a broad and important one and that trick is mRNA.” The biotechnology behind the Covid-19 vaccine is a powerful one with programmes to cure zika, HIV, cancer and a range of other ailments making the recent windfall unlikely to be a once-off.
Regarding the tightening of regulation in the Chinese technology sector and its impact on Tencent, the team thinks that the Chinese government is ahead of the curve in terms of regulation and that democratic western nations will eventually implement similar regulatory changes. They believe that companies that “go with the grain of society” and who are aware of their broader impact on society will find it easier to prosper. In this regard, Chinese tech companies are further along the route of enlightenment.
Lastly, Tom Slater does not agree that higher inflation and rising interest rates should lead to lower valuations on growth stocks. He cautions investors to also consider the impact of pricing power on some of these high growth companies as they become market leaders in their field. Therefore, with higher expected future inflation, one should also adjust the future cash flows that will yield a better current valuation. Looking past the current volatility, the fund has invested in some ground-breaking technology and the managers are excited by the intersection of computing power and biology calling the opportunity set “large and varied” They have 49 investments in private companies, and it is not difficult to imagine the next Amazon and Tesla coming from that pool.
Invest Today
Spend some time with our team to find out which one of our portfolios is best for you!